What the Endorsement Guides are, and why they reach a small practice
The Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising, at 16 CFR Part 255, explain how the FTC applies its ban on deceptive advertising to reviews, testimonials and influencer posts. The Commission approved the current version 3-0 on June 29, 2023.3 That revision added a formal definition of "clearly and conspicuously", addressed fake reviews and employee endorsements more directly, and noted that platform disclosure tools may not be enough.3
There is no size threshold. A three-chair dental office whose front desk posts "best dentist in town" on Instagram is in the same position as a supplement brand paying a creator. The Guides are about the connection and the claim, not the budget.
Who has a material connection to your practice?
The Guides say a connection must be disclosed when it "might materially affect the weight or credibility of the endorsement" and is not something the audience would reasonably expect.4 They list business, family and personal relationships, monetary payment, and free or discounted products "regardless of whether the advertiser requires an endorsement in return".4 Early access and the chance of winning a prize can count too.4
| Who posts about the practice | Connection | Disclosure needed? |
|---|---|---|
| Paid local influencer | Payment | Yes, in the post |
| Influencer given a free treatment or package | Free service | Yes, even if no post was required |
| Staff member on a personal account | Employment | Yes, even if the profile names the employer |
| Owner’s spouse or relative | Family | Yes |
| Patient entered in a giveaway for posting | Chance of a prize | Yes |
| Patient who paid full price and posted unprompted | None | No |
The staff row catches most practices. The FTC’s FAQs say an employee should disclose the relationship in the post even when it is listed on their profile, because followers may never see the profile.1
How should the disclosure look?
The FTC’s guide for influencers asks for plain words such as "advertisement", "ad" or "sponsored", placed where people will see them with the endorsement, not buried in a profile, at the end of a caption, or behind a "more" link.2 For images and Stories, superimpose it on the image. For video, put it in the video itself, not only in the description, and repeat it during a live stream.2
The FAQs name the weak versions: "#sp", "#partner" and "thanks [brand]" on their own are ambiguous.1 For a practice, a short plain sentence beats a hashtag. "I work at Harbor Chiropractic" or "Harbor Chiropractic gave me this adjustment free" is clear to anyone.
Platforms have their own switches. YouTube asks creators to tick the paid promotion box, which adds a label at the start of the video, and states that creators and their partners "are also responsible for understanding and complying with all applicable legal requirements".5 Other platforms offer similar labels. Use the label and also say it in words; the FTC places responsibility with the influencer and the brand, not the platform.13
The part that matters more for health: what the post says
Disclosure fixes the connection. It does not fix the claim. The Guides say an advertiser "must possess and rely upon adequate substantiation, including, when appropriate, competent and reliable scientific evidence" for claims made through endorsements, just as if it had made them itself. They add: "Consumer endorsements themselves are not competent and reliable scientific evidence."4
So an influencer saying your acupuncture "cured my migraines" is your claim, and it needs the same proof as if it were on your homepage. The rules for that proof are in health claims on a practice website.
Results are the second trap. A post describing one patient’s experience on a key attribute "will likely be interpreted as representing that the endorser’s experience is representative" of what others will get.4 If you cannot show that, the post must clearly state what people generally experience.4 "Results not typical" alone does not do it. For health practices, my position is to keep patient stories about the experience of care (how they were treated, how the visit ran) rather than outcomes. It is safer, and it is what prospective patients want to know anyway.
Your job as the practice: train, check, fix
The FAQs say advertisers need reasonable programs to train and monitor the people who post for them, including periodic checks and, where feasible, approving posts before they go up.1 For a practice that means:
- A one-page written policy for staff: disclose you work here in every post about the practice, never describe a patient, never promise a result.
- A short brief for any influencer or ambassador, with the exact disclosure wording and a list of claims they may not make.
- A monthly search of your practice name on each platform to catch posts that miss the disclosure.
- A plan to ask for corrections, and to stop working with anyone who repeats the problem.
Patient privacy sits on top of all of this. A staff post that shows a patient or mentions their treatment is a HIPAA question as well as an FTC one, covered in responding to reviews without breaking HIPAA. Testimonials used on your own site follow the rules in testimonials and social proof.
Reviewing social profiles, staff policy and claims together is part of a technical and compliance rebuild. This post explains FTC guidance as published. It is not legal advice.